Login
Login
ENGLISH ARABIC
Microdata Catalog
  • Data Catalog
  • Announcements
  • Citations
    Home / Central Data Catalog / SDN_NBHS_2009_HD_V2.0 / variable [F15]
central

National Baseline Household Survey, NBHS 2009

Sudan, 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
SDN_NBHS_2009_HD_V2.0
Producer(s)
Economic Research Forum, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS)
Collections
Income and Expenditure Surveys ERF Harmonized Datasets
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
May 08, 2014
Last modified
Oct 30, 2014
Page views
225329
Downloads
9828
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • Sudan09-HH-V2
  • Sudan09-IND-V2

Expenses on total Gifts and in-kind food (TOTGIKD)

Data file: Sudan09-HH-V2

Overview

Valid: 0
Valid (weighted): 0
Invalid: 7913
Invalid (weighted): 4725545.595
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 2
Start: 499
End: 502
Width: 4
Range: -
Format: Numeric
Weighted variable: V2708

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category
Sysmiss
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Description

Definition
Food and beverage products received from other households
Universe
All households
Source of information
Data Dictionary & Questionnaire/Codebook
Expenditure aggregates.pdf indicates items aggregated under each expenditure type

Imputation and derivation

Coder instructions
Aggregate computed by ERF (Ref: Data Dictionary.pdf/Expenditure Aggregates.pdf)

Others

Notes
GENERAL NOTES
----------------------
In some datasets, this category may be aggregated with purchased food or own produced food


COUNTRY SPECIFIC NOTES
----------------------------------
An attempt to estimate an imputed amount for the household own stock, own produced and gifts received was conducted using the unit of measurement, the estimated unit price and the quantity used of each product type, provided in the dataset.
The estimation was performed on both the product and the household levels. Inconsistencies and discrepancies between the average unit price and the unit type were first detected which led to primarily question the credibility of the estimates of the unit prices provided. The doubts in the quality of the unit prices data was confirmed when the Gini coefficient computed using the annual expenditure that includes the imputed amounts of own stock, own produced and gifts received exceeded 90%. While that computed using the total expenditure on only purchased items was equal to 38.27% compared to 35.29% derived from the World Bank tool of poverty indicators (PovCal).
Accordingly, expenditure amounts on purchased products only were disseminated in the harmonized data file.
Back to Catalog
ERF NADA

© ERF NADA, All Rights Reserved.